Showing posts with label Jasmin Santana. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jasmin Santana. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 07, 2017

Cuyahoga Politics Today: Election Ruminations

Election Day Watch
We talked in our earlier post today about the power of voters to initiate transformative change in various local and statewide elections in this misnamed "off-year".

In this post we list several races in Cleveland and its suburbs that we will be watching as Election Day unfolds. But first we touch on some ballot issues, foremost of which is Issue 61, the bond issue for Cuyahoga Community College.

Yes on Issue 61
Tri-C is approaching its 55th birthday, which means there are few active adults in these parts who can clearly remember when we had no community college around. Confession: I’m one of them. I remember when the College started, seemingly not much more than a glorified high school in a ramshackle collection of old buildings. Its growth since that inauspicious beginning, guided by strong lay and professional leadership, has been more than remarkable. Tri-C has become an indispensible member of our area’s institutions of higher learning, an economic driver, a business innovator, and so much more. The growth of its physical plant has carried its flag all over the county to such an extent that I was astounded to hear in a presentation on Issue 61 that this was the College’s first-ever capital bond issue. It would be difficult to think of a more worthy YES vote than Issue 61.


Yes on Issue 2
Like most of you, I have been perplexed by the cacophony of nonstop messaging pounding us relentlessly on Issue 2, the proposed statewide ballot measure to tie the cost of prescription drugs. I tried with great difficulty to tune out the incessant commercial messages and to seek out the facts. News articles were inconclusive; experts were all over the map.

To my surprise, I was persuaded by an excellent television news report on WKYC-TV3 last week. The report debunked one of my main concerns — allegations about the State having to pay for private attorneys to fight challenges to the Amendment, which proposes to lower costs of prescription drugs. And the report further informed me that the measure’s chief supporter nationwide uses his company’s revenues to provide low cost medications to third world countries, many of which are in Africa.

Amidst all the conflicting claims, that was good enough for me.

Notable area electoral contests
• Will Beachwood residents finally vote out its incredibly greedy mayor? Will Gail McShepard become the first African American to win a seat on city council, thereby becoming only the second African American ever to hold elective office in Beachwood? [David Whitaker, both a practicing attorney and a licensed psychologist, was elected to the Beachwood Board of Education in the 1990s.]

• Will Lora Thompson become Lyndhurst’s first-ever African American council member?

Garfield Heights features two council races that may impact that first ring suburb’s tortuous adjustment to new demographic realities. There may be an old guard somewhere farsighted enough to embrace change, but it’s not in Garfield.

• We’ll be watching the election returns for Cleveland City Council closely to see the outcome of several hotly contested council seats. The collective outcome of several races could result in drastic change at Cleveland City Hall no matter who wins the mayor’s office. Those races include: Ward 1, where former councilman Joe Jones is expected to oust incumbent Terrell Pruitt; Ward 2, where a newcomer will replace the departing Zack Reed; Ward 4, where all sensible human beings will support a ticker tape parade when double dipping Ken Johnson’s ponytail finally departs council chambers. We will also be watching Ward 5, where Phyllis Cleveland tries to hold off the up and coming Richard Starr; this is the Frank Jackson’s ward, so she and the mayor may rise and fall together.

Then there is Ward 6, where city hall insider and Jackson loyalist Blaine Griffin, appointed to the seat earlier this year, will likely hold off articulate newcomer Josh Perkins McHamm. Ward 6 is of pivotal importance for its location and diversity. It includes the Fairfax, Buckeye, and Little Italy neighborhoods, and is home to University Circle, and corporate behemoth Cleveland Clinic.

Ward 7 is also of strategic importance for its location in and adjacent to University Circle. Incumbent T. J. Dow is clearly no establishment favorite, owing at least in part to his emphatic embrace of his Hough area residents. Corporate funds appear to have flowed to challenger Basheer Jones, but his embarrassing pre-primary defense of his status as a legal resident of Hough before the Board of Elections seriously dampened any enthusiasm this corner might have had for his promise as a public official.

Finally, there is Ward 14, where Jasmin Santana is hoping to duplicate her primary victory over incumbent Brian Cummins, and bring a new and much needed Hispanic perspective to the council floor.

• Perhaps the most intriguing suburban race is the mayor’s contest in impoverished East Cleveland, where Devin Branch, running as an independent with the support of the Green Party, has an excellent chance to defeat incumbent Brandon King. Branch led the successful recall movement that ousted former mayor East Cleveland, leading to King’s elevation to mayor from city council. In some byzantine dealings, King was subsequently appointed to council but barred from serving due to some alleged charter chicanery.

What interests us most about Branch is his unalloyed love for his town and his vision of how to make it a better place. He is an eloquent apostle for East Cleveland and an unabashed lover of black people. East Cleveland’s political culture is as toxic as the notorious Noble Road dump that the EPA is spending $6 million to dismantle. If anyone can restore a semblance of sanity and fresh air to East Cleveland City Hall, it is likely to be an indefatigable believer like Branch.

There are also numerous judicial races in and around Cleveland. These seats often directly impact the quality of life and the life chances of many area residents. Voters should make sure they go all the way to the end of the ballot, armed with info gleaned from friends, neighbors, and sites such as www.judge4yourself.com.

# # #

-->

Monday, May 22, 2017

CPT | Latest on status of the Q deal referendum drive, Ward 14, Marcia Fudge, Jeff Johnson

CPT: Cuyahoga Politics Today

Confrontation looms as citizen’s coalition files more than Twenty Thousand Signatures to put Q deal on ballot

City Council leadership signals legal strategy to avoid referendum; issue may soon be in court


UPDATE: Today’s lead item was written with the understanding that a citizen’s coalition would file petitions today so that Cleveland voters could decide by referendum whether or not to support the Q deal. Before we posted it, word came to us that City Council leadership, meaning the mayor and those who call the shots in town, had refused to accept the petitions on the grounds that the City has already signed a contract to go ahead with the project and that it would be an unconstitutional interference with property rights to allow for a referendum at this stage.

Council's clerk subsequently received the petitions but the City's position is now clear. The battle lines have now been more sharply drawn and the matter will undoubtedly be decided in court. The importance of Councilman Cummins’ 12th vote in favor of the deal now stands in sharper relief: it is clear that the insiders’ strategy all along was to shut down the people’s right to vote on the Q deal.

I won’t venture an opinion on the outcome of the impending lawsuit, but the brazenness and contempt of our public officials for the voice of the people is evident. I expect that attorneys for both petitioners and the city began weeks if not months ago to prepare for the coming battle.

We have thought for months that the Q expansion deal would heighten interest in this year’s citywide election for mayor and all 17 council seats. Today’s action guarantees it.
___

CLEVELAND — This morning's filing of over 20,000 signatures of registered Cleveland voters moves into a new phase the very public discussion on whether the public should spend $282 million to expand Quicken Loans Arena.

Proponents of the deal cite the necessity of maintaining the competitive status of the publicly owned facility and the Q's importance as a major driver of local economic activity.

Opponents say by and large they don't oppose maintaining and even improving the arena but have major reservations — economic, pragmatic, and moral — about this deal, which appears to have been agreed to with great nonchalance by city and county officials, most especially County Executive Armond Budish, Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson, and their respective council presidents, Dan Brady and Kevin Kelley.

While downtown interests are all in for the deal, most city voters are troubled by the sense that these glittering large scale projects have few if any benefits that trickle down to their neighborhoods.

Typically, and this deal exemplifies the process, the little folk have no seat at the table, are not even in the room, and in fact have no knowledge a deal is even being cut until the fancy power point slides have been created and the sleek website designed. Testimony at early county council meetings seemed to suggest that the negotiations were even more of a charade this time, with little if any energy expended by the public's representatives to secure any community benefits.

This might be baffling if it weren't simply the extension of a well-established pattern. Entrenched power has a natural appetite for expansion until it meets resistance. When resistance appears, it is usually episodic, unorganized, inchoate, marginalized, bought off, or otherwise rendered ineffective. 

That business would proceed as usual was no doubt the expectation at the time of the mid-December press conference rollout announcing the deal, which was presented as a fait accompli, all wrapped up and tied with a big red bow in keeping with the festive holiday season. Pictures of the occasion showed participants still basking in the aura of our World Champion Cleveland Cavaliers, contemplating the promise of a new season, the super-sizing of a downtown jewel, and even the cherry on top of an NBA All Star game. Tipped off in advance, the Plain Dealer obligingly had a full color spread celebrating the inevitable success of this project, the latest pearl in a string that included the NBA championship, the 2016 GOP convention, the remaking of Public Square, the Indians' World Series run, and a spate of new hotel and restaurant openings.

But over on the side, a voice could be heard, asking questions, expressing concerns, urging caution, and framing the deal in a larger context.

That voice was dismissed. As I write this, it is showing up at City Hall with 20,000 + signatures calling for a vote, saying we will be heard.

A new phase in the dialogue now begins. Stay tuned.

###

Speaking of new voices, and petitions, we believe this Q debate is pivotal for our community in ways both macro and micro, communal and individual. When the dust settles, the landscape will be different.

A harbinger of that change may come tomorrow at noon over at the Board of Elections where Jasmine Santana will file to become a certified candidate for Cleveland City Council. She has her sights set on the Ward 14 seat currently
Jasmin Santana
held by Brian Cummins, who is a part of City Council's leadership team and who, by virtue of his very public and critical flip on the Q deal, whereby he became the crucial 12th vote in favor, perhaps claimed the biggest bull’s-eye on his back for incumbent council members.

Santana, at 38, would likely reshape Council chambers in several ways. If elected she would be the first Latina on city council, and the first Hispanic to serve in that body since council was reduced to its present 17 member size. Hispanic leaders with whom we have spoken see her as an agent of change in a City Hall that clearly needs it.

And while ethnicity is no reliable predictor of change or politics — some of City Hall's most ossified fixtures are African American — Santana's election would likely mean that persons of color would hold a majority of council seats for the first time in history.

###

Speaking of color, Congresswoman Marcia Fudge made several ear-catching statements over the weekend. One of the most intriguing was her reference to the commonplace but erroneous assumption that black members of Congress represent only black people. She noted that her district was at 50.1% just barely majority black. She repeated that statistic later when she suggested she might be the last black person to represent the 11th District.

Fudge was participating in a community conversation sponsored by the Western Reserve Chapter of the Links in conjunction with their 30th anniversary.
###

Finally, the petition challenging the legality of Councilman Jeff Johnson's right to run for mayor owing to his 1998 conviction is on the agenda for tomorrow's 3:30pm Board of Elections meeting.