Congresswoman's endorsements carrying less and less weight
Almost two years ago to the day, Congresswoman
Marcia Fudge attempted an “ill-conceived and ineptly concealed private maneuver”
to shape the outcome of the local Democratic Party judicial endorsement process.
The botched effort to secure endorsements for two black women candidates, which
we reported on here,
brought to the surface the uneasy racial tensions that infects so much of local
Democratic politics.
But if you thought the Congresswoman would be
deterred from long distance interference, you were sadly mistaken. Last month she
endorsed five candidates for county judgeships.
Despite there being several competent black women
candidates, including two sitting municipal court judges, all five candidates Fudge
chose to endorse are white.
U.S. Rep. Marcia Fudge chairing hearing on voting rights at Cuyahoga Community College on April 25, 2019 |
Not a single one of the Congresswoman’s choices
won the endorsement of the party’s Executive Committee.
What does this mean? For starters, it says that Fudge,
who has represented Ohio’s storied 11th District since 2008, wields
astonishingly little influence within party ranks. Her choices gain little
benefit from her announced support, and those who run against her candidates do
so without political cost.
Our highest ranking elected official is
essentially impotent when it comes to advancing our political interests.
This is a disastrous state of affairs for the
black community. The political weakness of our Congressperson may not be
apparent if one looks only at the election returns every two years. But after
this year’s Census, Congressional districts will be expanded and redrawn, and there
are lots of factors at play that could mean that the 11th District seat
may no longer continue as a safe preserve of black representation.
Signs of discontent are beginning to emerge within
the District over the current state of affairs. The Cleveland NAACP recently
joined forces with two political action groups to organize the Unified
Endorsement/Ratings Process [UERP]. The three groups plan to vet candidates
based on specific criteria of special import to the black community. Judicial
candidates will be examined, for example, for their understanding of cultural
competency, their appreciation of implicit bias, and their commitment to systemic
reform.
The focus this year will be on judicial candidates,
expanding over time to include legislative and executive races on local,
county, state and national levels. The process launches this week with
interviews scheduled for tonight and tomorrow from 5p-9p at the Harvard
Community Center, 18240 Harvard Ave. [44128].
This initiative arose out of concerns that the judge4yourself.com process,
while well-regarded, nonetheless had some flaws best addressed by this new
process. A representative of GPAC, which is comprised largely of activists and
clergy, and is a NAACP partner in the UERP process, says its work will
complement, not displace, judge4yourself.
The third partner in this new effort, FIINPAC
[Formerly Incarcerated Individuals Necessary Political Action Committee], has
distinguished itself in years past with some productive voter registration
efforts.
A unique feature of the UERP process is that while
the NAACP will limit itself to rating candidates, FIINPAC and GPAC intend to
endorse candidates and to extend campaign support to those it endorses.
Signs
of Clergy Unrest
A more ominous indication that Congresswoman Fudge
could be out of step with her constituency arose yesterday when she appeared at
the weekly meeting of United Pastors in Mission. UPM, originally formed as an association
of young activist pastors, has now matured into a collective of some political
sophistication, with regular programming that has become part of the bipartisan
campaign circuit for state and local public officials.
Fudge was there to tout her slate of judicial
candidates but got pushback from several clergy members on at least two counts.
Attendees wanted to know why she did not endorse Joy Kennedy, a well-qualified
black attorney, for Domestic Relations judge. Fudge’s answer seemed to indicate
surprise that Kennedy had remained in the race.
More problematic for Fudge by far was her avowed
support for Gabriella Rosalina, whose father, Basil Russo, gained local renown
as a ward leader and city councilman representing Little Italy, eventually
rising to majority leader. before becoming a judge, first in Common Pleas, and
then the Court of Appeals. Along the way, he ran unsuccessfully for mayor 1979.
Russo has long been a formidable ballot name
county wide. Basil’s brother is chief judge of Probate Court. But another
brother, Frank, tarnished the family name when he resigned as County Auditor in
2010 after pleading guilty as a ringleader in the county corruption scandal.
Basil has been pulling out all the stops to get
his daughter the nomination, making contributions and pledges of financial
support left and right, along with calling in old political favors. Some
combination of these efforts was apparently enough to win Fudge’s support,
along with that of 14 out of 17 Cleveland city councilmen.
Candidate Rosalina, however, has an undistinguished
record as an attorney and is clearly uncomfortable on the campaign trail. She was
the proverbial doe in headlights when seeking the party’s endorsement last
month, which went to her opponent, Lisa Forbes, by such a surprisingly wide
margin that Basil reportedly felt double-crossed.
The sense that Rosalina is an inferior candidate
and that Forbes handily won the party endorsement led some UPM members to
question Fudge’s game plan.
Part of the Congresswoman’s problem is the absence
of any discernible criteria for what it takes to win her blessing.
An opaque process, resulting in an announcement of
support without an accompanying rationale, followed by the proffer of zero
resources beyond perhaps a played out radio commercial, and no consequence for
ignoring or contravening the endorsement, have reduced a once-prized 11th
District endorsement to little more than a trinket.
The extreme political weakness of the black
community has been developing for several years. As we head to Black History
Month we’ll talk about why that is and what the future may hold.
# # ## #
#
2 comments:
Good article. Thank Richard.
Thank you!
Post a Comment