It would be hard to imagine a more ill-conceived
and ineptly concealed private maneuver than what Cleveland area Congresswoman
Marcia Fudge unveiled last night during a telephone conference that was leaked
before it was over.
Apparently intent on leaving no rock unturned in a
last-ditch effort to secure the endorsement of the county Democratic Party for
two judicial candidates whom she has personally endorsed, Fudge personally conducted
the telephone meeting with several east side elected officials, party leaders,
and political activists.
There were close to 20 people on the conference
call, which lasted only about 15 minutes. Fudge was calling from Washington DC,
where Congress was in session.
Multiple sources speaking on condition of anonymity
said the Congresswoman advanced a scorched earth policy: if the Party’s
executive committee refuses to endorse Andrea Nelson Moore and Deborah M.
Turner, Fudge wants her allies to push for a no endorsement policy in all 2018
races, including other judicial races as well as county and state legislative
contests.
What has people most upset about the meeting is
that party chair Shontel Brown took an active part in the strategy session.
Brown, who represents District 10 in County Council, is a Fudge protégé. She
became party chair last summer amidst whispers that she lacked the
sophistication and experience to handle the job, and that the powers behind the
throne would be some combination of Fudge, Cleveland City Council president
Kevin Kelley, and one or two others.
Brown’s active and open participation in an effort
to help Turner and Moore means of course, that the party chair was scheming
against their opponents, including Ashley Kilbane, who is running for the
nomination in one judicial primary race against Moore; and Karrie Howard, who
is vying for nomination to the same open seat as Turner and Mickey Mottl.
Howard and Kilbane received the most votes in their respective races at last
week’s meeting of city and ward leaders from across the county.
Fudge’s efforts to impose her will on the
endorsement process is likely to produce strong and perhaps chaotic pushback at
today’s executive committee meeting, where senior party leaders decide on
endorsements for the May 8 primary in some two to three dozen judicial,
legislative, and state races. The meeting is scheduled to start at 9am at
Euclid High School. The first question on the agenda could be whether Brown can
conduct the meeting impartially.
Fudge had confided to associates before the
conference call that she would attend today’s meeting to personally confront
executive committee meetings over their refusal to endorse black judicial
candidates. She seems to discount the fact that Karrie Howard, a former federal
and state prosecutor who is receiving support from virtually every corner of
the county, is unabashedly black. Fudge acknowledged in the meeting that
pressure had been placed on Howard to leave the race he is leading to clear
space for Turner but that he had declined. The
Real Deal Press has learned that Kilbane also refused similar entreaties.
Much of the intrigue appears aimed at saving face
for the Congresswoman, who risks the prospect of today’s meeting ending with
her favored candidates striking out.
Several political consultants with whom we spoke
following the meeting thought Fudge’s strategy was both unworkable and unsound,
and that her tactics verged on bullying.
But there was virtually no dissent expressed from
those on the call, according to several sources with knowledge of the meeting.
State Rep. Kent Smith, who is Euclid city leader, did say that Howard had
considerable support among his members who could not be counted on to support
the Fudge plan.
Besides the clear impropriety of Brown’s active
involvement in the scheming, what amazes most people who have spoken with RDP
about the meeting was its gross indiscretion. Little attempt was made to vet
the invited conferees, and no attempt was apparently made to exclude others who
joined the call anonymously, ensuring that details of the call would become
known even before Fudge could rejoin her colleagues in the Capitol.
In addition to Fudge, Brown, and Smith, the
following people are known to have to been on the call, as confirmed by
multiple sources or the individuals themselves:
Cleveland city councilmen Joe Jones [Ward 1], Blaine
Griffin [6], Kevin Conwell [9], Anthony Hairston [10]; county councilwoman
Yvonne Conwell [District 7]; Shaker Heights city leader Lisa Payne Jones;
former Cleveland councilman Zack Reed; former Richmond Hts. mayor Miesha
Headen; political activists Willie Britt, Kenn Johnson, Kent Whitley, and Angela Shute Woodson. Also
on the call was Fudge political adviser Ken Dowell, who reportedly arranged the
call.
Richmond Heights city council president Eloise
Henry was also identified as having been on the call, but
we have been unable to confirm her attendance as of publication.
And there were others.
Fudge is reported to have expressed the need to get
Turner and Moore nominated as a sign of support for chairman Brown. But, as one
listener said, “Shontel’s job is to do what Marcia needs done.”
In fairness to Brown, it is generally considered
part of the chair’s duty to clear the field for preferred candidates in appropriate
circumstances. But usual considerations of timing, manner, and nuance were
disregarded in this instance.
There were some other intriguing comments
attributed to the Congresswoman. One was a claim of entitlement for the black
community, which provided substantial support to county executive Armond Budish
in 2014. Fudge was also reported to have said that if west side Democrats would
not support black candidates, they would be denied access to black pulpits.
-->
Why Fudge and Brown would burden Howard and Kilbane
with the responsibility to pay back support to Budish, or what power Fudge has
over black clergy, was not detailed.
2 comments:
This post has been updated to reflect that Angela Woodson is confirmed as having been on the conference call with Rep. Fudge.
Shontel did Marcia's bidding to a tee. She RIPPED the executive committee. Stated she wanted to change the judicial endorsement process and accused the party of not treating black judicial candidates fairly. (not mentioning there are two black candidates w/o opposition and the fact that others had good support). Shontel's comments were not viewed positively by many non-black members in attendance. I wonder how much support there will be for Shontel after that stunning and embarrassing performance.
Post a Comment