Properly understood, the Civil
Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s was one of the most democratic episodes
in American political history. There was no script written by some great
playwright in the sky, handed out in communities across the country. There was
no universally acknowledged director, no head of central casting, and no formal
audition process. The relationships between leaders and followers were often fluid.
Compared to earlier socio-political
movements — the Abolitionist, Women’s Suffrage, Labor — the civil rights movement
was considerably more organic, decentralized, communal, and emergent. Much of its
strength, brilliance, and resilience came from a shared set of ideals and a
growing belief in the possibility of change.
It is fair to say that during the
movement there was a more dynamic symbiotic relationship between whoever was
leading at the moment and the masses of black people and their allies. It was
often messy and it certainly wasn’t perfect; nonetheless there seemed to be a
widely shared understanding that followers were as important as leaders.
A major consequence of the civil
rights era was an opening of the political sphere to broader participation by
black people as both voters and consequently as elected officials. In the
aftermath of Movement success, the number of black elected officials holders
has increased from fewer than 1500 in 1970 nationwide to more than 10,500 today. There are about eighty African American
elected public officials in Cuyahoga County alone today, and possibly a few
hundred in the State as a whole.
What is less clear is how this
apparent political power has operated to advance the community in whose name it
has been sought and wielded. Some observers argue that black political
leadership is by and large disconnected from the community. It is no longer axiomatic, if it ever was,
that black political leaders are of, from and for the people.
Compounding the analysis is a
series of demographic and geographic changes that no longer concentrate a vast
majority of African Americans within a single political boundary. Does it make
a difference to be a black elected official when ten or twenty or fifty or
eighty percent of your constituency is nonblack? What impact has this had on
the fact that poor Americans of all colors and stripes have been virtually
dropped from the political discussion?
• • •
No comments:
Post a Comment