Regular reporting and commentary on the interplay of race, class and power in the civic, business and cultural spaces of NEO from the inner rings of Cuyahoga County, Ohio.
Primary interests: Cleveland/NEOhio regional public affairs; African American politics, commerce, culture and society; public education; national and international affairs; Cavaliers∫Browns.
Showing posts with label Hon. Marcia Fudge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hon. Marcia Fudge. Show all posts
Cuyahoga County Democratic Party executive director Ryan Puente has stepped down after two and a half years on the job.
Puente, who announced the move simultaneously via Twitter and Facebook, says that he is leaving "to pursue another opportunity".
With a number of high profile races on tap for 2021, including the Cleveland mayoral race and a likely Congressional race, the timing and vagueness of Puente's statement on social media is sure to fan speculation about his next move.
There have been rumblings Puente will soon sign on to run a campaign. More than one person has linked him to political newcomer Justin Bibb, who made a splash recently with the announcement his committee had banked to close $180,000 in less than three months for a likely run for Cleveland mayor.
It is hard to imagine better preparation to run a mayoral campaign than Puente has acquired over the past few years as the go-to person for virtually every Party activity. He has worked closely with both party officials and rank and file, earning kudos from all corners for his dedication, knowledge, and professionalism.
In a recent letter to Party members, Chairwoman Shontel Brown wrote, “Ryan has been outstanding in his role as Executive Director, I can’t begin to tell you how many positive comments I have received about Ryan and his commitment to the job. He is so very responsive to everyone, and he juggles so many things at once. He has credibility in the community which says a great deal about our organization.”
Cleveland city councilman Blaine Griffin, commenting on Puente's exit, described him as "one of the most talented people I've run across in the political arena."
Puente's exit comes at an especially critical time for the party. While he has been acclaimed as the high efficiency engine behind many of the organizing and campaign successes local Democrats have enjoyed recently, county and city Democrats have also been roundly criticized for low turnout, especially among Cleveland voters last month. Among those criticized for poor effort have been state party chair David Pepper, who has stepped down, Cleveland mayor Frank Jackson, and Congresswoman Marcia Fudge, who was announced earlier this month as President-elect Joe Biden's choice to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Should Fudge be confirmed by the Senate, she would resign from Congress, leaving a vacancy to be filled in a special election around the same time as Cleveland's mayoral campaign will kick off.
Party chair Brown is among the announced candidates for Fudge's 11th District seat if and when it becomes open. Former state senator Nina Turner and former Cleveland councilman Jeff Johnson have also tossed their hats into the ring.
Given that the party's endorsement in the primary will be highly sought, questions of party leadership are sure to receive added scrutiny. Puente told The Real Deal Press that the short term plan will involve the Party's hiring a part time office manager until his replacement is found.
Citizens Group takes City Council reduction off the ballot to "study" issue
Clergy group rides to restauranteur's rescue
Groundhog Day came two days
early in Cleveland this year as voters ready to speak truth to power once again
had their ballots snatched away in last minute negotiations conducted at a
table where they had no seats.
Two proposed charter
amendments — one to reduce the size of Cleveland City Council from 17 to 9 members,
the other to slash the pay of council members from about $83,000 to $58,000 —
were all set to be on the ballot on the March 17 primary election, when Clevelanders First, the group
sponsoring the charter initiatives, agreed to withdraw their petitions for the
equivalent of $24.00, some moth-eaten blankets and two nose-bleed seats to a
Monsters hockey game.
Reducing Council's size could lead to a realignment whereby for the first time in history, Cleveland would have a majority black council.
Restauranteur and Busi- nessman Tony George
The deal was announced Friday
afternoon by Rev. Aaron Phillips at a hastily-arranged press conference on Friday
afternoon at Greater Abysinnia Baptist Church on the city’s east side. Phillips
is executive director of the Cleveland Clergy Coalition, which he describes as
an “amalgamation of most of the city’s clergy groups”. Clevelanders First, an ad
hoc assembly of mostly west siders, was represented by its spokesmen and by businessman
Tony George, who clearly runs the group. George funded the effort to secure the
22,000 petition signatures submitted to city council in December. Once the
petitions were ruled valid by the Board of Elections, council was required to
put the issues on the ballot.
Also present were east side
councilmen Mike Polensek and Joe Jones.
Noticeably absent from the
press conference and seemingly not party to the deal was council leadership:
President Kevin Kelley, Majority Leader Phyllis Cleveland and Majority Whip
Blaine Griffin.
George
backs down
How and why this deal came
together is not altogether clear. In fact, Phillips said on his Monday radio
show that while he favored a resolution that would keep reduction off the
ballot, he feared it wasn’t going to happen. By the end of the week, he was
proclaiming its accomplishment. He also made some comments about race that bear
scrutiny.
While the Clergy Coalition’s
actual size and strength is not apparent, what is clear is that Phillips has
become an important player in local politics. His political consulting firm,
Engagement Consulting LLC, is regularly contracted for service, especially by white
west side judicial candidates without bona fide crosstown community
connections. His ability to get these candidates in front of black preachers
adds to his credibility, if not necessarily to that of the ministers.
Phillips has also become an
adept multi-platform communicator. He has a Monday drive-time radio show on
WERE which he simulcasts on Facebook. Recent guests have lined up precisely
with candidates endorsed by Congresswoman Marcia Fudge, who Phillips touts as
the indisputable leader of the black community.
Phillips is also reputed to
have a close relationship with George, who may have overplayed his hand in this
council reduction issue. It was widely reported that George wanted Council to switch
the city’s electricity contract from NOPEC to First Energy, and that Kelley’s
refusal to go along led George to push council reduction as payback.
But as George himself acknowledged
at the press conference, he pushed a similar council reduction issue back in
2008. Then-council President Marty Sweeney was willing to negotiate city
charter changes that George thought reasonable.
Rev. Aaron Phillips, shown above with County Prosecutor Michael O'Malley and County Executive Armond Budish, right, at October 2019 fundraiser for the Cleveland Clergy Coalition.
George told me months ago
that he was willing to negotiate this time as well, that he was open to a
reduction in council size to perhaps eleven or thirteen. Kelley, however, was
intractable, perhaps because one of George’s conditions was that Kelley resign
from council, or at least step down as president. Kelley, who is expected to
run for mayor if Frank Jackson ever retires, of course found George’s position
wholly unacceptable.
Rev. Aaron Phillips with Cleveland City CouncilPresident Kevin Kelley at October fundraiser. The event was held at Crop Restaurant on Lorain Ave. in Ohio City. The restaurant is one of many owned by Tony George.
Phillips said at the news
conference that a reputable organization, most likely Cleveland State
University, would be asked to perform a comparative study to establish what
council’s optimal size and configuration should be.
While George praised the idea
as brilliant, and repeatedly thanked Phillips for the Coalition’s intervention,
the study seems like a fig leaf to cover George’s total capitulation. When Kelley
refused any deal, George chose to fold, despite holding what was likely the
whip hand, given the voters’ rampant displeasure with City Hall. Speculation in
some circles is that George didn’t want to fund a campaign that he had thought
he could win for what it cost to gather sufficient petition signatures.
When George belittled Kelley
and his leadership team at the press conference for their refusal to accept the
deal whatever recommendations may come out of the study, his combative tone belied
the fact of his total surrender. Neither Jones nor Polensek, the two councilmen
who spoke at the press conference, is a staunch Kelley supporter; their presence
seemed designed to suggest that George actually had a negotiating partner.
Winners and
Losers
The obvious winners in this
ballot issue cancelation are Phillips, council members, and Mayor Frank Jackson,
who recorded two “e-newsletters” that essentially said cutting council in half
would make council even more distant from the voters.
George was not the only big
loser in this deal. Any Cleveland voters looking to reform a legislative body
that has circumvented their efforts to secure a living wage, stop the unpopular
decision to expand the Q [now Rocket Mortgage Arena], and had to be forced to address
the lead poisoning crisis, by threat of yet another voter initiative, have once
again been deprived of an opportunity to be heard. Their choice has been taken
away, and this time they don’t even have a villain.
And possibly rubbing salt in
the wound, the ballots are already printed so voters will see the two issues.
If Clevelanders First follows through as expected and notifies the Board of
Elections to withdraw the petitions, the board is required to post signs at the
polls saying votes on the issue will not count.
Early voting begins February
19.
When is
race NOT a factor?
With Cleveland’s hyper
segregation, no discussion of representation can take place without considering
the impact of race. In fact, when we spoke with black opponents of council
reduction, they typically focused on the diminution of black power since there
would be fewer black council members. They seemed not to consider whether a
reduction process might lead to a realignment whereby for the first time in
history, Cleveland might have a majority black council.
Both on his radio show last
week and at the press conference, Phillips suggested that the council reduction
issue would in effect lead to a race war between the east and west sides of
town. This hoary argument apparently had some effect on the west side Clevelanders
First, because they said they were unaware of these tensions and wanted to
avoid them.
What’s more likely is that
some black councilmen were ready to play the race card in order to scare their
constituents into believing that council reduction was a strategy to contain
black political power.
Implications
for redistricting, 2021 mayor’s race
The 2020 census may prove us
wrong, but we believe it likely to show some surprising demographic shifts in
the city’s population. We suspect the city’s proportion of people of color has
shifted westward in the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis that hollowed out
much of the city’s east and southern sections.
What this means for the redrawing
of ward lines is totally unknown. Council presidents have usually had a large
say in how this has been done in the past. But Kelley, who paradoxically is
seldom challenged by his caucus, is not a strong president. In a secret ballot
he likely would not be favored to retain his post. And if Jackson decides not to
run for a record fifth term, Kelley is expected to run to succeed him. Will he
be able to control the reshaping of ward boundaries in an election year?
Congresswoman's endorsements carrying less and less weight
Almost two years ago to the day, Congresswoman
Marcia Fudge attempted an “ill-conceived and ineptly concealed private maneuver”
to shape the outcome of the local Democratic Party judicial endorsement process.
The botched effort to secure endorsements for two black women candidates, which
we reported on here,
brought to the surface the uneasy racial tensions that infects so much of local
Democratic politics.
But if you thought the Congresswoman would be
deterred from long distance interference, you were sadly mistaken. Last month she
endorsed five candidates for county judgeships.
Despite there being several competent black women
candidates, including two sitting municipal court judges, all five candidates Fudge
chose to endorse are white.
U.S. Rep. Marcia Fudge chairing hearing on
voting rights at Cuyahoga Community College
on April 25, 2019
Not a single one of the Congresswoman’s choices
won the endorsement of the party’s Executive Committee.
What does this mean? For starters, it says that Fudge,
who has represented Ohio’s storied 11th District since 2008, wields
astonishingly little influence within party ranks. Her choices gain little
benefit from her announced support, and those who run against her candidates do
so without political cost.
Our highest ranking elected official is
essentially impotent when it comes to advancing our political interests.
This is a disastrous state of affairs for the
black community. The political weakness of our Congressperson may not be
apparent if one looks only at the election returns every two years. But after
this year’s Census, Congressional districts will be expanded and redrawn, and there
are lots of factors at play that could mean that the 11th District seat
may no longer continue as a safe preserve of black representation.
Signs of discontent are beginning to emerge within
the District over the current state of affairs. The Cleveland NAACP recently
joined forces with two political action groups to organize the Unified
Endorsement/Ratings Process [UERP]. The three groups plan to vet candidates
based on specific criteria of special import to the black community. Judicial
candidates will be examined, for example, for their understanding of cultural
competency, their appreciation of implicit bias, and their commitment to systemic
reform.
The focus this year will be on judicial candidates,
expanding over time to include legislative and executive races on local,
county, state and national levels. The process launches this week with
interviews scheduled for tonight and tomorrow from 5p-9p at the Harvard
Community Center, 18240 Harvard Ave. [44128].
This initiative arose out of concerns that the judge4yourself.com process,
while well-regarded, nonetheless had some flaws best addressed by this new
process. A representative of GPAC, which is comprised largely of activists and
clergy, and is a NAACP partner in the UERP process, says its work will
complement, not displace, judge4yourself.
The third partner in this new effort, FIINPAC
[Formerly Incarcerated Individuals Necessary Political Action Committee], has
distinguished itself in years past with some productive voter registration
efforts.
A unique feature of the UERP process is that while
the NAACP will limit itself to rating candidates, FIINPAC and GPAC intend to
endorse candidates and to extend campaign support to those it endorses.
Signs
of Clergy Unrest
A more ominous indication that Congresswoman Fudge
could be out of step with her constituency arose yesterday when she appeared at
the weekly meeting of United Pastors in Mission. UPM, originally formed as an association
of young activist pastors, has now matured into a collective of some political
sophistication, with regular programming that has become part of the bipartisan
campaign circuit for state and local public officials.
Fudge was there to tout her slate of judicial
candidates but got pushback from several clergy members on at least two counts.
Attendees wanted to know why she did not endorse Joy Kennedy, a well-qualified
black attorney, for Domestic Relations judge. Fudge’s answer seemed to indicate
surprise that Kennedy had remained in the race.
More problematic for Fudge by far was her avowed
support for Gabriella Rosalina, whose father, Basil Russo, gained local renown
as a ward leader and city councilman representing Little Italy, eventually
rising to majority leader. before becoming a judge, first in Common Pleas, and
then the Court of Appeals. Along the way, he ran unsuccessfully for mayor 1979.
Russo has long been a formidable ballot name
county wide. Basil’s brother is chief judge of Probate Court. But another
brother, Frank, tarnished the family name when he resigned as County Auditor in
2010 after pleading guilty as a ringleader in the county corruption scandal.
Basil has been pulling out all the stops to get
his daughter the nomination, making contributions and pledges of financial
support left and right, along with calling in old political favors. Some
combination of these efforts was apparently enough to win Fudge’s support,
along with that of 14 out of 17 Cleveland city councilmen.
Candidate Rosalina, however, has an undistinguished
record as an attorney and is clearly uncomfortable on the campaign trail. She was
the proverbial doe in headlights when seeking the party’s endorsement last
month, which went to her opponent, Lisa Forbes, by such a surprisingly wide
margin that Basil reportedly felt double-crossed.
The sense that Rosalina is an inferior candidate
and that Forbes handily won the party endorsement led some UPM members to
question Fudge’s game plan.
Part of the Congresswoman’s problem is the absence
of any discernible criteria for what it takes to win her blessing.
An opaque process, resulting in an announcement of
support without an accompanying rationale, followed by the proffer of zero
resources beyond perhaps a played out radio commercial, and no consequence for
ignoring or contravening the endorsement, have reduced a once-prized 11th
District endorsement to little more than a trinket.
The extreme political weakness of the black
community has been developing for several years. As we head to Black History
Month we’ll talk about why that is and what the future may hold.