In what may have been the last question* from the
audience after a panel presentation on how catalyst projects throughout metro
Cleveland impact the small business community, city councilman Kevin Conwell,
whose Glenville area ward encompasses deep poverty cheek by jowl with the
region's wealthiest concentration of institutional assets, rose to ask how the
kinds of projects being discussed might be designed to benefit the whole
community, especially those parts that suffer from "abject poverty".
Cleveland City Councilman Kevin Conwell's 8th Ward encompasses the wealth and power of University Circle
as well as the poverty and promise of Glenville.
|
Conwell’s “tale of two cities” question was
asked against the backdrop of a recent incident that clearly had him distressed;
he had referenced the same issue earlier that week at the annual meeting of
Famicos Foundation. Conwell spoke in both instances about having to call the
city's health department over the filthy and unsafe conditions at Park Place, a
122-unit concrete estate that sits near the southwestern foot of University
Circle. While geographically the estate sits just off the west end of
Opportunity Corridor,
Conwell's question came after a discussion
featuring Kyle Dreyfuss-Wells, chief executive of the Northeast Ohio Regional
Sewer District; Carl Naso, CFO of the Port of Cleveland; David Ebersole,
Cleveland's economic development director; and Deb Janik, senior vice president
for real estate and business development at the Greater Cleveland Partnership,
the nation's largest chamber of commerce.
Before Conwell's question brought the discussion
down to earth, Janik had extolled the Opportunity Corridor, saying the project
was a "foundation upon which to rebuild every single neighborhood".
She praised her organization for its role in Cleveland's over-hyped "public-private
partnership" development model, saying that "no one does [PPP] better
than Greater Cleveland, and no one ever has." Unable to check her
enthusiasm, Janik professed her belief in Cleveland's being the "greatest
city in the country".
These comments fairly cried out for the
counterpoint that Conwell's question provided. As we discussed with a friend
afterwards, clearly just asking the question is not enough. But too often at
such civic engagements — this annual meeting of the Uptown Business Association,
held in the elegant quarters of Case Western Reserve University's Alumni Center
— the concerns Conwell raised are invisible and unvoiced.
Several weeks ago, the managing partner of a
midsize downtown law firm ratcheted up a civic debate on Cleveland's sorry ranking
across a variety of metrics in contrast to our perceived municipal competitors.
There was an immediate cry to round up and interrogate the usual suspects,
worthy of Captain Renault at the end of Casablanca. Amid cries to form this or
that committee or commission, there was scarcely a peep from Cleveland's black community,
whose issues must be addressed if this region is ever to stop circling the
drain.
There should not be a public meeting in Greater
Cleveland on the status, accomplishments or prospects of our city or region,
attended by any would be leader or representative of the black community, where
the disparities and inequities of our community are not discussed. Nowhere is
the timidity and fecklessness of our current leadership more in evidence than
in our inability or unwillingness to even put our issues on the table.
Outside of our local sports icons, the three
most celebrated public figures in most black homes are likely Martin Luther
King, Carl Stokes and Muhammad Ali. All are now nearly universally lauded for
their courageous stands born of principled conviction. But every one of them
was vilified when they were standing strong. And many of those who sing their
praises the loudest today battled them viciously every step of the way.
Where are today's representatives capable and
willing to speak truth to power?
* We were unable to stay and hear any response to Conwell's question.
# # #