By their words and deeds ye shall know them
The four mayoral
candidates at the LWV forum in Richmond Heights last week offered voters three
starkly different visions of the city's condition and future.
One candidate seemed to think everything was hunky dory, the future was bright, the citizenry was content and might even wish to consider erecting a new municipal building on public land across from City Hall. He said repeatedly the city was solvent, “not broke”.
That candidate was Dan Ursu, the city's six-term incumbent who seems blissfully unaware of the economic and demographic challenges his city has encountered since he became mayor in 1989. He cited his biggest accomplishment as leading the successful fight to keep the city’s hospital open when the Cleveland Clinic acquired it several years ago and planned to close it. His plans for the city’s future include encouraging development along Curtiss Wright Blvd. Understandably, he was the only candidate who said he was opposed to term limits.
A second vision, that the city is heading straight to hell in a hand basket, was energetically trumpeted by longtime resident Dave Ali, who is in his first try for public office. The former owner of several businesses in Cleveland's Glenville neighborhood, Ali sounded like an apprentice carpenter with one tool. He argued that the answer to every problem the city had was financial and could be solved only by was a full-time mayor with a forthright business approach. On several occasions, he added, “If it don’t make dollars it don’t make sense.”
Among these problems, according to
Ali, are high property taxes, municipal
insolvency, inadequate police protection, poor snow removal, an alienated
citizenry and a declining school system. He cited his rebuilding of an entire
block on St. Clair Avenue in Glenville and said he wanted to do the same for Richmond Heights.
A third approach was presented by
first-term councilperson at large Miesha Headen. She was in
general agreement with Ali on many of the city’s problems, especially relating
to the city’s fiscal condition and lack of city services, but she also
identified municipal assets on which to build. She touted the city’s fire
department as one of the county’s finest, saying that all of its employees were
trained paramedics and that the chief was expert. She suggested that Richmond
Heights could take the lead in joint efforts with other cities in collaborating
around this asset.
Headen, an
accountant by training, was elected in 2009 on a platform of accountability, efficiency,
and transparency in government services, attracting more commercial business
and revenue to the city, environmental stewardship and investing in the
municipal services needed to retain families. She said that she had uncovered
the city’s clandestine purchase of 39 properties and forced the Ursu
administration to publicize these properties on the city website.
The fourth candidate turned in an
odd performance. Eloise
Henry is an intelligent and capable councilwoman who can be insightful
in discussing her city. She was the first to declare in this year’s mayoral campaign but the last to file, submitting her petitions at deadline. But on
this night she appeared disinterested, unprepared, and more than once lost her
train of thought when answering a question. She said her biggest accomplishment
in public life was securing the county assistance in eliminating the flooding
of residents’ homes.
NOTE: The Real Deal has extended an offer to candidates to share
their vision for Richmond Heights directly to the voters via a short unedited
video. Two candidates have agreed to participate so far.
