Showing posts with label 2020 Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2020 Election. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Portman waffles to avoid angering core Trumpers

Calls for panel to investigate claims of voter fraud

By Marty Schladen


Ohio U.S. Sen. Rob Portman with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images.


Ohio Sen. Rob Portman is continuing to raise doubts about the integrity of American elections — even after President Donald Trump’s lies about the 2020 election fueled a deadly insurrection at the Capitol while Congress was trying to certify that Joe Biden had beaten Trump.

And while he continues to say we need to “restore confidence in the integrity of our electoral system,” Portman won’t respond when asked for evidence of widespread voter fraud in the Nov. 3 or any other election.

Portman, a Republican, appears to be trying to walk a line between reality and the wishes of constituents whom Trump has convinced are victims of massive fraud.

On Nov. 23, after multiple recounts, serial Trump losses in the courts and while states were certifying their votes, Portman wrote an op-ed in the Cincinnati Enquirer saying that Biden was “likely” to be the next president.

Four days earlier, Portman’s colleague, Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, took to Twitter to say that Trump “failed to make even a plausible case of widespread fraud or conspiracy.” But in his column, Portman wrote something quite different.

“There were instances of fraud and irregularities in this election, as there have been in every election,” he said. “It is good that those have been exposed and any fraud or other wrongdoing should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but there is no evidence as of now of any widespread fraud or irregularities that would change the result in any state.”

Portman’s office at the time ignored requests to produce evidence of any fraud, much less the 12,000 or so fraudulent votes it would have taken to swing the outcome in Georgia.

Last week, after unsuccessfully wheedling and threatening state officials to try to get steal them to steal the election, Trump called a mob of about 8,000 to Washington, D.C. to “stop the steal.” After Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani exhorted the crowd to engage in “trial by combat,” Trump directed them to the Capitol.

They smashed their way in, killed a Capitol police officer, and effectively took the Legislative Branch hostage. One of the rioters was shot and killed while the mob smashed furniture, attacked journalists and looked for Vice President Mike Pence and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, apparently to kidnap or kill them.

In the wake of the outrage, Republican leaders such as Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Josh Hawley of Missouri came under withering criticism for stoking the lie that the election had somehow been stolen. Just hours after the deadly riot, Hawley, Cruz — and five House members from Ohio — again objected to certifying the election, again promoting the fevered myth that motivated the mob in the first place. 

Many are now calling that myth “the big lie.”

Portman didn’t join Cruz and Hawley in their objections. But in a tweet Sunday, he continued to cast doubt on the integrity of U.S. elections, saying he wanted to form a blue-ribbon panel to investigate and restore public confidence.

Cruz has been criticized for citing the high percentage of people who believe the election was rigged as a justification to continue contesting it. Of course, a big reason why so many don’t think it was on the level is that Trump, Cruz and many others have used their megaphones to repeat the lie at every opportunity.

False claims of voter fraud now have something of a history in the United States.

In 2007, the George W. Bush Justice Department was embroiled in scandal after it fired seven U.S. attorneys after they refused to prosecute bogus voter fraud cases. Despite the scandal, the GOP persisted in claiming fraud and passing laws they said would fight it.

Portman and others might be reluctant to produce evidence of widespread voter fraud because it seems vanishingly hard to find. For example, more than 135 million people voted in the 2016 presidential election, but it produced just four documented cases of voter fraud. That’s a rate of .00000003%.

Despite his win in 2016, Trump lied relentlessly about voter fraud to explain away the fact that he lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million. He appointed a commission to investigate voter fraud, but it closed up shop without issuing a report, much less having proven fraud.

Critics say a big reason why the GOP doggedly pushes the voter-fraud narrative is that it justifies laws — such as requiring a photo ID — that benefit it politically. For example, 25% of Black voting-age citizens, who are likely to vote Democratic, don’t have a valid government ID, while only 8% of white citizens don’t, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University Law School. 

Not only have Portman, Trump and others not produced any evidence of widespread fraud, this year’s claims don’t make sense. Instead of being an objective attempt to root out fraud wherever it might exist, Trump and his supporters have only been claiming it where it serves to their advantage.

For example, Trump is not claiming fraud in North Carolina, a swing state he won. And while some Georgia and Arizona congressmen are saying their states’ presidential races were marred by massive fraud, they’re not troubled about votes they received on the same ballots.

In a passionate speech amid the rubble of last Wednesday’s attack on American democracy, Romney called on his Republican colleagues to stop lying to Americans about the election.

“No congressional-led audit will ever convince those voters, particularly when the president will continue to claim the election was stolen,” the former Republican presidential nominee said. “The best way we can show respect for the voters who were upset is by telling them the truth.” 

• • •• • •

This story is provided by Ohio Capital Journal, a part of States Newsroom, a national 501 (c)(3) nonprofit. See the original story here.

Friday, October 02, 2020

DeWine walks tightrope in Thursday presser

By Marty Schladen


President Donald Trump meeting with governors, including Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine.
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images


Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine on Thursday provided a glimpse of how difficult it is to be a traditional Republican officeholder in the era of Trump.

The governor has been holding regular press briefings since the spring, when the coronavirus began tightening its deadly grip around the Buckeye State. But on Thursday, he started off by deploring Tuesday’s presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, which has been almost universally panned as an uncivil shout fest. 

According to one count, the interruptions came at the rate of one a minute, and Trump was the interrupter 75% of the time. Trump also stirred controversy by refusing to condemn a right-wing hate group, unleashed a torrent of false claims about the integrity of the vote, and again refused to say that he would accept the independently certified results of an election that polls say he is currently losing.

On Thursday, DeWine reiterated his support for Trump while criticizing the debate generically.

“The debate itself was not our country’s finest hour,” the governor said, adding that “The name calling by both sides simply is not helpful,” and criticizing “hate groups of both the right and the left.”

That DeWine criticized the debate at all is a little jarring in light of his post-debate tweet.

“A great job tonight by @realdonaldtrump!” it said. “Congratulations to tonight’s sponsors @cwru and @ Cleveland Clinic on hosting on a great debate.”

The governor’s critics accused him of both-sides-ism, especially as he and Lt. Gov Jon Husted again sought to reassure Ohioans that their election system is safe and fair. After all, only one of the candidates — Trump — has railed relentlessly and without evidence that mail-in ballots are vulnerable to rampant fraud.

“We have run fair elections in Ohio for a long, long time and I think it’s important on both sides — let’s not presuppose that we’re going to have a problem when both parties have an interest in having a fair election,” DeWine said, adding, “Voters should have confidence in Ohio that their vote is going to get counted.”

During the debate, Trump also fanned worries about voter intimidation when he made unsupported claims of election stealing and urged supporters to  “go into the polls and watch very carefully.”

Apparently responding to those worries, DeWine again couched his warning in terms of both sides.

“We have an obligation to make sure that people of the right and left who want to create a disturbance, who don’t believe in the rule of law, who believe that violence should take over, that that is dealt with,” he said.

Perhaps the most striking is DeWine’s unwillingness again to criticize Trump for refusing to say he’ll respect the independently certified results of the election. That refusal has aroused profound dismay among some observers of the international scene.

Asked last week if he condemned an earlier refusal by Trump to promise to abide by the results of the election, DeWine said, “I don’t condemn anything. I don’t know what’s in his heart or in his mind.”

Asked again whether he condemned Trump’s statements from last week as well as those from the debate, DeWine again declined.

“Whoever loses, once it’s determined that they’ve lost, they lose,” the governor said.

He talked about contested presidential elections in 1960 and 2000. In neither case did the losers, Richard Nixon and Al Gore, refuse in advance to say that they would respect the result, but DeWine cited those as precedents for this year’s contest.

“Whoever loses will concede,” He said. “This is what we do as Americans. This is what we do. This is what we expect and that’s the name of the game.”

Pressed further on whether he would criticize things Trump has said and done in recent weeks, DeWine betrayed how difficult his situation must be.

“Press conference after press conference, I get asked about different comments made by the president or somebody else,” the president’s Ohio co-chair said. “I’m not here to answer every single thing the president says.

“I think I’ve been very clear throughout my career and throughout my time as governor what I believe in and what we will do. It’s not just what I believe in. It’s not just what I say. And so we’ll continue to speak out against violence. We’ll continue to speak out against anything that disrupts the fairness of the election. We’ll continue to speak out against hatred, violence. That’s what my job is. My job is not every single day to critique the president of the United States, or is it to critique Joe Biden. If there’s another president in there in January I’ll have the same attitude.”

• • •• • •
This story is provided by Ohio Capital Journal, a part of States Newsroom, a national 501 (c)(3) nonprofit. See the original story here.