This is a day for Real Deal
mini-pieces.
1. Blogging
daily Sunday through Friday is more than a notion. Phone calls, reading,
research, getting out & about, piecing things together — in short, doing
the work of reporting before the actual writing, can skew
your senses. Which is why in Wednesday’s column, when I meant to say that I
would be talking about state house redistricting the day after tomorrow, i.e.
Friday, I wrote "Thursday". I realized my error a couple of
hours after I published Part II. With blog technology, I could have just
changed Thursday to Friday but I knew that some of you would come back today
expecting what isn’t here, go back and double-check Wednesday’s promise and
say, "hmmm." So you have this long-winded apologia in the name of,
all together now: transparency.
2. Our
discussion of black political leadership has obviously touched a sore spot with
many of our readers. We know this from the volume of off-line emails and the
phone calls we are receiving. This public conversation would certainly be
more invigorating if more of the comments were placed on site instead of
emailed to me. Just so you know, I will never quote an email writer by name,
but I am growing more inclined to post some of your comments. My takeaway from
many of the comments is that many people resent the notion that any three
unelected persons could be posited as speaking for such a widely diverse
community. People are glad that The Real Deal is willing to call out the
PD and Brent Larkin for a horrible piece — somebody has to do it,
you say — but unwilling or unable themselves to get down and dirty about it.
3. One
thing I can say about Messrs. Stokes, Forbes, and Pinkney is that they
understand power and are not afraid to use it when it suits their purposes. The
mostly private debates center on how often, how well, how wisely they have
exercised power on the community’s behalf.
4. With
respect to former Cleveland City Council president [1974-1989], current satrap
of the Call & Post and current NAACP president Forbes [1992-way too
long], much of the discussion centers on the abuse of that power. I went off to
college in 1963, the year Forbes was first elected to public office, so he has
been a constant presence on the Cleveland scene my entire adult life. He has
become a fixture on the local landscape much like one of the obsolete manufacturing
plants that dot many Cleveland neighborhoods. You remember when they belched
smoke and soot during your childhood. Today they remain as monuments to a
different era, their windows boarded, the doors rotting, the premises littered
with broken bottles and mountains of trash, amid the weeds. They will not go
away by themselves and many cannot be retrofitted.
5. In my
Cleveland, George and Arnold and Lou are as much one-name icons as the player
who took his talents to South Beach. They are actually quite personable and
charming when they want to be. But charming is not what is needed these days.
As one of my correspondents wrote me at 0430 today, “Keep in mind what is
really important. Not this notion of who is the leader but what can we do [to]
address the sorry socioeconomic state of affairs and hopelessness of many
everyday black folks.”
Another reader asked
rhetorically why the triumvirate would want to proclaim their leadership over
the black community, given its current socioeconomic and cultural state. Either
they weren’t leaders or they failed, he said.
6. During
my travels around the community over the years I have had several informal
encounters with George Forbes. He has said things that are real windows into
his worldview. For example, simple arithmetic led to his accumulation of power
at City Hall. He knew as long as held eastside black councilmen together he
needed only one white vote to hold the reins of power. A primitive and cold
calculus to be sure, but realpolitik in late-twentieth century Cleveland.
7. Many
black people are very fond of quoting the Frederick Douglass, perhaps the first
and certainly one of the most exemplary national African American leaders. In
an 1857 speech, Douglass said:
Power
concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out
just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact
measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will
continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The
limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.
The
Douglass quote was obviously pre-Civil War and applicable to the struggles for
emancipation. During the civil rights era it was a rallying cry for collective
action against the tyranny of Jim Crow, de facto segregation, and all sorts of
invidious discrimination, much of which continues to this day.
Forbes understands the first sentence of
the Douglass quote. But insofar as Greater Cleveland’s black community, however
defined, resents the implications of Larkin’s statement about their leadership,
they should consider themselves the subject of Douglass’s third and fourth sentences, and
respond appropriately.
•
• •
The entire Douglass speech is worth a read. Find it here.
3 comments:
Dear Richard - Keep up the good work. It is so important that you are willing to openly have this conversation. I am sorry that I do not have the courage to post openly. Forbes and Pinkney are still very scary men. They can turn the white people and their white money against you.
Thanks for your encouragement. Do you have evidence for what you suggest? I think much of what appears to be the power of some is actually apparent power as opposed to the real thing. The commmunity needs to present and publicize alternate possibilities.
I"m a white person and Pinkney and Forbes can't turn me against anyone. Like Richard, I am not sure who they actually influence.
Post a Comment